Spider-Man is a Gimmick [MAJOR SPOILERS]

Let’s face it. The average, everyday comic is not much unlike a soap opera. Drama unfolds, bizarre elements are thrown in and the stories continue on in a never ending serialization. Of course, comics have the potential to be so much better, and they have been, but they’re normally the same. People even make fun of them for the same things. In soap operas everyone has an evil twin, people fight over who gave birth to what baby, everyone has amnesia, and people come back from the dead.

These gimmicks are trademarks to the soap opera genre and these gimmicks are what keep the general population from seeing them as anything other than a joke. In comics, people are cloned, babies come in and out of continuity, there’s amnesia and comas, and people come back from the dead. Those are the gimmicks that make many people think comic books are a joke.

Spider-Man doesn’t help that image. Spider-Man is a gimmick. Not Spider-Man himself, but the stories he appears in. Think about the most well known Spider-Man stories in the last 20 years. The ones that got either a lot of attention from the media, or just stick out like sore thumbs in the ongoing story of Peter Parker. There was “the Clone Saga”, where Peter was cloned and a new character, Ben Reilly took his place for a time. That went on for several years during the ’90s. Then a few years later, with the release of Spider-Man in theaters, there was “The Other”, where Peter Parker was turned into a giant spider, died, and gave birth to himself just so he’d have organic web shooters like in the movie.

Then there was the “One More Day” debacle that was so unpopular, where Peter made a deal with the devil in order to save his Aunt. That was a major turning point in the story of Spider-Man. Peter and Mary Jane were no longer married, his secret identity was no longer public knowledge, Harry Osborn was now alive. Everyone hated the story and the new status quo. A few years later and it looked like Spider-Man was finally starting to make sense again. Amazing Spider-Man was shipping three times a month, story lines would come and there were no problems. Then Superior Spider-Man happened and I can only imagine how people will react to that.

The dying Doctor Octopus transfers his mind into Peter Parker, and unable to reverse the procedure, Peter allows Ock to take his memories along with his body. The ‘real’ Peter Parker dies in Ock’s body and now Spider-Man is Doctor Octopus. So he will now toe the line between hero and villain, pretend he’s really Peter Parker, since he has all his memories, and generally lie to everyone he knows. Sure, the idea is an interesting storyline, but the heart of it is yet another gimmick. Mind swapping, mind control, memory transfer. Another gimmick to create a more violent Spider-Man. This is the new status quo, and it is more permanent than “The Other” and even “Brand New Day”. Amazing Spider-Man has ended based around another comic book gimmick.

How will this get new readers into Spider-Man? Someone coming from the outside, who knows nothing about comics, other than the gimmicks that have made the medium so laughable to them for years, is told that Spider-Man is now possessed by Doctor Octopus. Who wouldn’t find that stupid? I find that stupid and I actually read comic books. That new reader, someone who is familiar with soap opera gimmicks, someone who probably scoffs at those same gimmicks, is supposed to take the idea that Doctor Octopus now possesses Spider-Man’s body and memories seriously?

Now think about the most well known Batman stories in the last 20 years. There’s “Knightfall”, when Bane broke Batman’s back. There’s also “No Man’s Land”, where Gotham is destroyed by an earthquake, there’s “War Games”, where a giant gangwar erupts. Then more recently there has been Batman RIP. Those are not so gimmicky. No clones, no mind possession. Those are well regarded stories. So is it better to stay away from goofy comic book gimmicks? Maybe. Superman  has the “Death of Superman”, and that’s about it. There was that time where he became blue and electric and split into two people, but no one remembers that. Superman has mostly laid low since the ’90s, doing a whole lot of nothing and staying away from any gimmicks, or really anything interesting at all. Maybe Superman suffers from a lack of gimmicks, while Spider-Man has too many. Or perhaps they just need better storytelling.

Good stories are always remembered. They might not always sell well on lesser titles, but at least they’re not remembered for being awful. Marvel has really kicked their line into high gear, pumping out genuine good stories with Marvel Now! so why would they rely on such a cliche storyline on their flagship title at a time where new ideas are being embraced? Dan Slott is simply feeding off a generation gone by, a time where it was acceptable to have clones and body snatchers and whatever other random sci-fi cliche you can think of. People are getting sick of super-heroes dying and coming back to life. It isn’t exciting anymore, so who is supposed to be excited about Peter Parker dying?

Obviously, this is a comic book and nothing but Uncle Ben, Bucky, Jason Todd are permanent, so things will change one day. Peter Parker will eventually return as Spider-Man, even if his title has ended. Amazing Spider-Man will always be remembered as THE Spider-Man title. What will Superior Spider-Man be remembered as?

3 thoughts on “Spider-Man is a Gimmick [MAJOR SPOILERS]

  1. Dylan

    Being as I feel like I am your typical non-comic reader and we discuss comics fairly often, I just want to pitch in my remark that I made to you a last night that I think this gimmick will be forgotten by the writers even, as many gimmicks are. The whole Spider-Man is Doc Ock thing will be quietly phased out, and Doc Ock will sort of assimilate with Peter Parker (in the sense of the character, not just in the sense that he has his body and memories), and then it will just be Peter Parker being Spider-Man again. Whether or not that Spider-Man proves to be more violent in the long run I think depends on how well a more violent Spider-Man is received and will ultimately have nothing to do with whether Doc Ock or Peter Parker is “truly” Spider-Man in Superior.

  2. ryigenchi

    Honestly i would’ve almost preferred that if they had to do the Doc Ock switch stupidity, that they let Peter get his body back but remnants of Ock were still in it. Making Peter smarter, but also a bit more violent. That would’ve gotten the edginess they needed and wouldn’t have pissed off soo many fans. And he could still be a SUPERIOR SPIDER-MAN. (With Doc Ocks personality complete personality intact being optional. Doc Ocks voice shouting stuff as Peter saves people could be interesting) People hate the stupidity of the story, and the fact that the villain is the good guy, and the good guy is pretty much forgotten and a villain in an unmarked grave for assholes.

    If you want to kill a hero, do it right at least. There were a million ways to do this interestingly. They just choose one of the few paths that would anger the world. If it had to play out this way, could’a been done better.

    1. Jason Cohen Post author

      I just have to think that the other pitches they received must have really sucked. I honestly haven’t seen anyone react positively to this story. Maybe, “lets see how it goes” or “this could be interesting” but no one’s saying “holy crap this sounds awesome!” I figured they would go more in line with what you just proposed. At least it would have still be Peter Parker and it could always just go away easily. This is going to be difficult to get rid of.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s